<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post6870309698336274808..comments</id><updated>2011-11-28T08:24:56.109+10:00</updated><category term='Transmittal'/><category term='Mitring'/><category term='Revit Implementation'/><category term='Hidden'/><category term='Structural Columns'/><category term='Conceptual Mass'/><category term='Parametric'/><category term='Family Standards'/><category term='Xrev Transmit'/><category term='Consulting'/><category term='Section'/><category term='Xrev'/><category term='Multi-Discipline'/><category term='Relocate Project'/><category term='Conditional Statements'/><category term='KAUST'/><category term='Addons'/><category term='Change Levels'/><category term='Revit 2012'/><category term='Productivity'/><category term='Curtain Patterns'/><category term='Revit Sheets'/><category term='Rendering'/><category term='Revit'/><category term='Multiple Offices'/><category term='Door Circulation'/><category term='Hatchkit'/><category term='Conference'/><category term='Roombook'/><category term='Materials'/><category term='Nested Voids'/><category term='Move Project'/><category term='Viewer'/><category term='Adaptive Components'/><category term='Floors'/><category term='Contracting'/><category term='Autodesk'/><category term='BIM'/><category term='Freeform'/><category term='Hatch Patterns'/><category term='sharing'/><category term='Nesting Families'/><category term='IPD'/><category term='Family Creation'/><category term='Revit 2011'/><category term='Issuing'/><category term='workaround'/><category term='Set downs'/><category term='Families'/><category term='Revit Training'/><category term='Extensions'/><category term='Breakwater Beacon'/><category term='Revit 2010'/><category term='Laser Cut Files'/><category term='Revit Addin'/><category term='Bluestreak'/><category term='ANZRS'/><category term='Rev it'/><category term='Nested Families'/><category term='Reporting Parameters'/><category term='Slabs'/><category term='BIM Register'/><category term='Revit Issuing'/><category term='Collaboration'/><category term='Formulas'/><category term='Elevation'/><category term='Falls'/><category term='View Depth Clipping'/><category term='Revit API'/><category term='Visibility'/><category term='RTC 2011'/><category term='Utilities'/><title type='text'>Comments on Revit Rants: Easily changing building levels</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/feeds/6870309698336274808/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html'/><author><name>Chris</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01382602297165554911</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7963/1881/1600/CP-NC.0.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>5</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-6908360628726990371</id><published>2011-11-28T08:24:56.109+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-28T08:24:56.109+10:00</updated><title type='text'>9/10 projects I have the site as a separate file. ...</title><content type='html'>9/10 projects I have the site as a separate file.  Simply for the fact that is much easier to move a the building around on the site, or the site underneath the building as a link.  The only time I&amp;#39;ll model the site in the same file is if the building pretty much occupies 100% of the site and thus doesn&amp;#39;t have to move anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So yes I would suggest that.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/6908360628726990371'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/6908360628726990371'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html?showComment=1322432696109#c6908360628726990371' title=''/><author><name>Chris</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01382602297165554911</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7963/1881/1600/CP-NC.0.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-6870309698336274808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/posts/default/6870309698336274808' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1764492031'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-663418688398895753</id><published>2011-11-27T17:05:39.139+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-27T17:05:39.139+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Regarding my last question: Is the simple solution...</title><content type='html'>Regarding my last question: Is the simple solution to create a separate site file and link in the building? Then I can move the building in x, y &amp;amp; z directions on the site and publish the coordinates back to the building file?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/663418688398895753'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/663418688398895753'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html?showComment=1322377539139#c663418688398895753' title=''/><author><name>rfunaro</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13757153295326365839</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-6870309698336274808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/posts/default/6870309698336274808' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1318152987'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-7394984079282120039</id><published>2011-11-27T16:30:37.528+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-27T16:30:37.528+10:00</updated><title type='text'>NOOB here, extremely frustrated with Revit&amp;#39;s l...</title><content type='html'>NOOB here, extremely frustrated with Revit&amp;#39;s logic. I have no cad from which to import. I do have a .jpg with spot elevations, from which I&amp;#39;ve created the beginning of a toposurface by placing points aligning to the imported image. I now know my finish floor elevation and want the toposurface to correspond to it. It looks like my only option is to change my finish floor elevation to its actual height, or the topo ends up 3400&amp;#39; above the building. You say &amp;quot;Are you crazy!!  Never do this!&amp;quot; I must be crazy because the program is driving me crazy! I just need to get on with my design and have wasted almost two hours unsuccessfully reconciling floor and topo elevations coordinate systems!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately, the Revit &amp;quot;Help&amp;quot; is worthless for this topic. Can you tell me what I should do so that I can continue to develop my toposurface without moving it up and down 3400&amp;#39; every time I need to make a refinement to it?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/7394984079282120039'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/7394984079282120039'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html?showComment=1322375437528#c7394984079282120039' title=''/><author><name>lost again again</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13757153295326365839</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-6870309698336274808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/posts/default/6870309698336274808' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1318152987'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-3236374475326815642</id><published>2011-11-21T10:06:11.191+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-21T10:06:11.191+10:00</updated><title type='text'>Of course.  Let me first state that 9/10 times I a...</title><content type='html'>Of course.  Let me first state that 9/10 times I am simply importing a 3D survey from AutoCAD to generate the Toposurface.  When importing it does need to host to a level, generally ground floor.  Then I simply move the AutoCAD file in elevation down by the shared coordinate RL that the Ground Level represents.  As such if, drawing a topography through placing points, I&amp;#39;d just let it be up really high to begin with.  Then when finishing the sketch using the move command to position it correctly with the building.  For the placement of the points there is no way as yet to tell these to be based off the shared coordinate system.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HTH.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/3236374475326815642'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/3236374475326815642'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html?showComment=1321833971191#c3236374475326815642' title=''/><author><name>Chris</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01382602297165554911</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7963/1881/1600/CP-NC.0.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-6870309698336274808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/posts/default/6870309698336274808' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1764492031'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-4699564097900529858</id><published>2011-11-21T10:01:04.296+10:00</published><updated>2011-11-21T10:01:04.296+10:00</updated><title type='text'>This method doesn&amp;#39;t seem to work with Toposurf...</title><content type='html'>This method doesn&amp;#39;t seem to work with Toposurfaces. The levels for Toposurfaces can only be set to &amp;quot;Absolute Elevation&amp;quot;. Therefore if you use the Shared Coordinates for your floor levels and then draw a Toposurface with the levels close to the RL&amp;#39;s of your floor level, the Toposurfae will be created a lot higher up than your floor level is drawn. Is there a way around this (i.e. get the Toposurface to use the Shard Coordinates as well)?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/4699564097900529858'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/6870309698336274808/comments/default/4699564097900529858'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html?showComment=1321833664296#c4699564097900529858' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.cadway.com.au/2011/11/easily-changing-building-levels.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19080627.post-6870309698336274808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19080627/posts/default/6870309698336274808' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2117290365'/></entry></feed>
